Re “A System Breeding More Waste,” by David Leonhardt (Economic Scene column, Sept. 23):
Mr. Leonhardt’s article is a good-faith effort to discuss both sides of an emotional issue. It acknowledges the fact that a majority of wrongfully injured patients never seek compensation. That means that culpable doctors get away with medical negligence.
Under our system of justice no doctor is held to account for a “mistake,” but only for falling below the established standard of reasonable medical care — that is, being negligent.
Some believe that the most effective reform would be a cap on damages — an artificial limit on negligently injured patients’ compensation. No state that has imposed such limits, to my knowledge, has seen a reduction in medical negligence or even a meaningful reduction in doctors’ malpractice insurance premiums.
Saying to a child or any patient who, because of negligent medical care, sustains permanent brain damage that his or her inability to have a normal life should be “fairly” compensated with $250,000 or $500,000 (for noneconomic damages) reduces medical negligence to a determinable cost of doing business for insurance companies and negligent doctors. Such “reform” is unfair to patients. Patrick J. Kenneally
Chicago, Sept. 23, 2009
The writer is a personal injury lawyer.![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=77e87018-da1c-449b-a267-8fb95dad0b65)
According to the survey, 62% of surgeons said they were not complying with a 48-hour week and half of consultants said compliance with the European regulation had been achieved at the expense of patient safety. RCS President John Black said: "Throughout this affair the call from the Department of Health has been that this legislation is about making patients safer. You can find more information regarding this from clinical negligence.
ReplyDeleteI like your post and everything you share with us is current and very informative.
ReplyDeleteAfrican Mango Juice